You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
miller-book/node78.html

875 lines
24 KiB

<!DOCTYPE html>
<!--Converted with LaTeX2HTML 2002-2-1 (1.71)
original version by: Nikos Drakos, CBLU, University of Leeds
* revised and updated by: Marcus Hennecke, Ross Moore, Herb Swan
* with significant contributions from:
Jens Lippmann, Marek Rouchal, Martin Wilck and others -->
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<TITLE>Waveshaping</TITLE>
<META NAME="description" CONTENT="Waveshaping">
<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="book">
<META NAME="resource-type" CONTENT="document">
<META NAME="distribution" CONTENT="global">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="LaTeX2HTML v2002-2-1">
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Style-Type" CONTENT="text/css">
<LINK REL="STYLESHEET" HREF="book.css">
<LINK REL="next" HREF="node79.html">
<LINK REL="previous" HREF="node77.html">
<LINK REL="up" HREF="node75.html">
<LINK REL="next" HREF="node79.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY >
<!--Navigation Panel-->
<A ID="tex2html1711"
HREF="node79.html">
<IMG WIDTH="37" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="next"
SRC="next.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1705"
HREF="node75.html">
<IMG WIDTH="26" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="up"
SRC="up.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1699"
HREF="node77.html">
<IMG WIDTH="63" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="previous"
SRC="prev.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1707"
HREF="node4.html">
<IMG WIDTH="65" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="contents"
SRC="contents.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1709"
HREF="node201.html">
<IMG WIDTH="43" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="index"
SRC="index.png"></A>
<BR>
<B> Next:</B> <A ID="tex2html1712"
HREF="node79.html">Frequency and phase modulation</A>
<B> Up:</B> <A ID="tex2html1706"
HREF="node75.html">Modulation</A>
<B> Previous:</B> <A ID="tex2html1700"
HREF="node77.html">Multiplying audio signals</A>
&nbsp; <B> <A ID="tex2html1708"
HREF="node4.html">Contents</A></B>
&nbsp; <B> <A ID="tex2html1710"
HREF="node201.html">Index</A></B>
<BR>
<BR>
<!--End of Navigation Panel-->
<H1><A ID="SECTION00930000000000000000"></A>
<A ID="sect5.waveshaping"></A>
<BR>
Waveshaping
</H1>
<P>
Another approach to modulating a signal, called
<A ID="5674"></A><I>waveshaping</I>,
is simply to pass it through a
suitably chosen nonlinear function. A block diagram for doing this is shown in Figure
<A HREF="#fig05.05">5.5</A>.
The function <IMG
WIDTH="25" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img14.png"
ALT="$f()$"> (called the
<A ID="5677"></A><I>transfer function</I>)
distorts the incoming waveform into a different shape. The new shape depends
on the shape of the incoming wave, on the transfer function, and
also--crucially--on
the amplitude of the incoming signal. Since the amplitude of the input
waveform affects the shape of the output waveform (and hence the timbre),
this gives us an easy way to make a continuously varying family of timbres,
simply by varying the input level of the transformation. For this reason,
it is customary to include a leading amplitude control as part of the waveshaping
operation, as shown in the block diagram.
<P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER"><A ID="fig05.05"></A><A ID="5681"></A>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION ALIGN="BOTTOM"><STRONG>Figure 5.5:</STRONG>
Block diagram for waveshaping an input signal using a nonlinear
function <IMG
WIDTH="25" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img14.png"
ALT="$f()$">. An
amplitude adjustment step precedes the function lookup, to take advantage of
the different effect of the wavetable lookup at different amplitudes.</CAPTION>
<TR><TD><IMG
WIDTH="172" HEIGHT="226" BORDER="0"
SRC="img432.png"
ALT="\begin{figure}\psfig{file=figs/fig05.05.ps}\end{figure}"></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
</DIV>
<P>
The amplitude of the incoming waveform is called the waveshaping
<A ID="5684"></A><I>index</I>. In many situations a small index leads to relatively little
distortion (so that the output closely resembles the input) and a larger one
gives a more distorted, richer timbre.
<P>
Figure <A HREF="#fig05.06">5.6</A> shows a familiar example of waveshaping, in which
<IMG
WIDTH="25" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img14.png"
ALT="$f()$"> amounts to a
<A ID="5687"></A>
<I>clipping function</I>. This example shows clearly how the input
amplitude--the index--can
affect the output waveform. The clipping function passes its input
to the output unchanged as long as it stays in the interval between -0.3 and
+0.3. So when the input does not exceed 0.3 in
absolute value, the output is the same as the input. But when the input grows
past the limits, the output stays within; and as the amplitude of the
signal increases the effect of this clipping action is progressively more
severe. In the figure, the input is a decaying sinusoid. The output
evolves from a nearly square waveform at the beginning to a pure sinusoid
at the end. This effect will be well known to anyone who has played an
instrument through an overdriven amplifier. The louder the input, the
more distorted will be the output. For this reason, waveshaping is also sometimes
called
<A ID="5689"></A>
<I>distortion</I>.
<P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER"><A ID="fig05.06"></A><A ID="5693"></A>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION ALIGN="BOTTOM"><STRONG>Figure 5.6:</STRONG>
Clipping as an example of waveshaping: (a) the input, a decaying
sinusoid; (b) the waveshaping function, which clips its input to
the interval between -0.3 and +0.3; (c) the result.</CAPTION>
<TR><TD><IMG
WIDTH="495" HEIGHT="367" BORDER="0"
SRC="img433.png"
ALT="\begin{figure}\psfig{file=figs/fig05.06.ps}\end{figure}"></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
</DIV>
<P>
Figure <A HREF="#fig05.07">5.7</A> shows a much simpler and easier to analyse situation,
in which the transfer function simply squares the input:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x) = {x^2}
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="66" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img434.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x) = {x^2}
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
For a sinusoidal input,
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
x[n] = a \cos(\omega n + \phi)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="140" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img76.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
x[n] = a \cos (\omega n + \phi )
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
we get
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x[n]) = {{a^2} \over 2} \left ( 1 + \cos(2 \omega n + 2 \phi) \right )
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="229" HEIGHT="41" BORDER="0"
SRC="img435.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x[n]) = {{a^2} \over 2} \left ( 1 + \cos(2 \omega n + 2 \phi) \right )
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
If the amplitude <IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img4.png"
ALT="$a$"> equals one, this just amounts to ring modulating the
sinusoid by a sinusoid of the same frequency, whose result we described in the
previous section: the output is a DC (zero-frequency) sinusoid plus a
sinusoid at
twice the original frequency. However, in this waveshaping example, unlike
ring modulation, the amplitude of the output grows as the square
of the input.
<P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER"><A ID="fig05.07"></A><A ID="5942"></A>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION ALIGN="BOTTOM"><STRONG>Figure 5.7:</STRONG>
Waveshaping using a quadratic transfer function <IMG
WIDTH="71" HEIGHT="34" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img15.png"
ALT="$f(x) = {x^2}$">:
(a) the
input; (b) the transfer function; (c) the result, sounding at twice the
original frequency.</CAPTION>
<TR><TD><IMG
WIDTH="474" HEIGHT="368" BORDER="0"
SRC="img436.png"
ALT="\begin{figure}\psfig{file=figs/fig05.07.ps}\end{figure}"></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
</DIV>
<P>
Keeping the same transfer function, we now consider the effect of sending in a
combination of two sinusoids with amplitudes <IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img4.png"
ALT="$a$"> and <IMG
WIDTH="10" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img21.png"
ALT="$b$">, and angular
frequencies <IMG
WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img7.png"
ALT="$\alpha $"> and <IMG
WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img8.png"
ALT="$\beta $">. For simplicity, we'll omit the initial phase
terms. We set:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
x[n] = a \cos(\alpha n) + b \cos(\beta n)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="193" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img437.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
x[n] = a \cos(\alpha n) + b \cos(\beta n)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
and plugging this into <IMG
WIDTH="25" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img14.png"
ALT="$f()$"> gives
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x[n]) = {{a^2} \over 2} \left ( 1 + \cos(2 \alpha n) \right ) +
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="208" HEIGHT="41" BORDER="0"
SRC="img438.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x[n]) = {{a^2} \over 2} \left ( 1 + \cos(2 \alpha n) \right ) +
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
+ {{b^2} \over 2} \left ( 1 + \cos(2 \beta n) \right )
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="131" HEIGHT="41" BORDER="0"
SRC="img439.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
+ {{b^2} \over 2} \left ( 1 + \cos(2 \beta n) \right )
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
+ a b \left [
\cos ( (\alpha + \beta) n ) + \cos ( (\alpha - \beta) n )
\right ]
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="247" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img440.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
+ a b \left [
\cos ( (\alpha + \beta) n ) + \cos ( (\alpha - \beta) n )
\right ]
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
The first two terms are just what we would get by sending the two sinusoids
through separately. The third term is twice the product of the two input terms,
which comes from the middle, cross term in the expansion,
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x+y) = {x^2} + 2 x y + {y^2}
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="174" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img441.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x+y) = {x^2} + 2 x y + {y^2}
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
This effect, called
<A ID="5708"></A><I>intermodulation</I>,
becomes more and more dominant as the number of terms in the input
increases; if there are <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img58.png"
ALT="$k$"> sinusoids in the input there are
only <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img58.png"
ALT="$k$"> "straight" terms in the product, but there are <IMG
WIDTH="75" HEIGHT="34" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img442.png"
ALT="$({k^2}-k)/2$">
intermodulation terms.
<P>
In contrast with ring modulation, which is a linear function of its input
signal, waveshaping is
nonlinear. While we were able to analyze linear processes by considering their
action separately on all the components of the input, in this nonlinear case we
also have to consider the interactions between components. The results are
far more complex--sometimes sonically much richer, but, on the other
hand, harder to understand or predict.
<P>
In general, we can show that a periodic input, no matter how complex, will
repeat at the same period after waveshaping: if the period is <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img135.png"
ALT="$\tau$"> so that
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
x[n+\tau] = x[n]
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="102" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img136.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
x[n + \tau] = x[n]
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
and temporarily setting the index <IMG
WIDTH="41" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img18.png"
ALT="$a=1$">,
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x[n+\tau]) = f(x[n])
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="146" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img443.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x[n+\tau]) = f(x[n])
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
(In some special cases the output can repeat at a submultiple of <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img135.png"
ALT="$\tau$">, so
that we get a harmonic of the input as a result; this happened for example
in Figure <A HREF="node77.html#fig05.04">5.4</A>.)
<P>
Combinations of periodic tones at consonant intervals can give rise to
distortion products at subharmonics. For instance, if two periodic signals <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img243.png"
ALT="$x$">
and <IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="29" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img106.png"
ALT="$y$"> are a musical fourth apart (periods in the ratio 4:3), then the sum of
the two repeats at the lower rate given by the common subharmonic. In
equations we would have:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
x[t + \tau/3] = x[t]
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="111" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img444.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
x[t + \tau/3] = x[t]
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
y[t + \tau/4] = y[t]
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="110" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img445.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
y[t + \tau/4] = y[t]
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
which implies
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
x[t + \tau] + y[t+\tau] = x[t] + y[t]
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="207" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img446.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
x[t + \tau] + y[t+\tau] = x[t] + y[t]
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
and so the distorted sum <IMG
WIDTH="62" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img447.png"
ALT="$f(x+y)$"> would repeat after a period of <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img135.png"
ALT="$\tau$">:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x+y)[n + \tau] = f(x+y)[n].
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="205" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img448.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x+y)[n + \tau] = f(x+y)[n].
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
This has been experienced by every electric guitarist who has set the amplifier
to "overdrive" and played the open B and high E strings together: the
distortion product sometimes sounds at the pitch of the low E string, two
octaves below the high one.
<P>
To get a somewhat more explicit analysis of the effect of waveshaping on
an incoming signal, it is sometimes useful to write the function <IMG
WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img112.png"
ALT="$f$"> as
a finite or infinite
<A ID="5712"></A><I>power series</I>:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x) = {f_0} + {f_1}x + {f_2}{x^2} + {f_3}{x^3} + \cdots
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="247" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img449.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x) = {f_0} + {f_1}x + {f_2}{x^2} + {f_3}{x^3} + \cdots
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
If the input signal <IMG
WIDTH="31" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img80.png"
ALT="$x[n]$"> is a unit-amplitude sinusoid, <!-- MATH
$\cos(\omega n)$
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="57" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img450.png"
ALT="$\cos(\omega n)$">, we
can consider the action of the above terms separately:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(a \cdot x[n]) = {f_0} + a {f_1}\cos(\omega n) + {a^2} {f_2} {\cos^2} (\omega n)
+ {a^3} {f_3} {\cos^3} (\omega n) + \cdots
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="461" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img451.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(a \cdot x[n]) = {f_0} + a {f_1}\cos(\omega n) + {a^2} {f_...
...\cos^2} (\omega n)
+ {a^3} {f_3} {\cos^3} (\omega n) + \cdots
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
Since the terms of the series are successively multiplied by higher powers of
the index
<IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img4.png"
ALT="$a$">, a lower value of <IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img4.png"
ALT="$a$"> will emphasize the earlier terms more heavily, and
a higher value will emphasize the later ones.
<P>
The individual terms' spectra can be found by applying the cosine product
formula repeatedly:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
1 = \cos (0)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="69" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img452.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
1 = \cos (0)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
x[n] = \cos (\omega n)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="100" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img453.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
x[n] = \cos (\omega n)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
{x^2}[n] = {1 \over 2} + {1 \over 2} \cos (2\omega n)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="161" HEIGHT="38" BORDER="0"
SRC="img454.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
{x^2}[n] = {1 \over 2} + {1 \over 2} \cos (2\omega n)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
{x^3}[n] = {1 \over 4} \cos (-\omega n) + {2 \over 4} \cos (\omega n)
+ {1 \over 4} \cos (3 \omega n)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="317" HEIGHT="38" BORDER="0"
SRC="img455.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
{x^3}[n] = {1 \over 4} \cos (-\omega n) + {2 \over 4} \cos (\omega n)
+ {1 \over 4} \cos (3 \omega n)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
{x^4}[n] = {1 \over 8} \cos (-2\omega n) + {3 \over 8} \cos (0)
+ {3 \over 8} \cos (2 \omega n) + {1 \over 8} \cos (4 \omega n)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="409" HEIGHT="38" BORDER="0"
SRC="img456.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
{x^4}[n] = {1 \over 8} \cos (-2\omega n) + {3 \over 8} \cos...
... {3 \over 8} \cos (2 \omega n) + {1 \over 8} \cos (4 \omega n)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
{x^5}[n] = {1 \over 16} \cos (-3\omega n) + {4 \over 16} \cos (-\omega n)
+ {6 \over 16} \cos (\omega n) + {4 \over 16} \cos (3 \omega n)
+ {1 \over 16} \cos (5 \omega n)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="553" HEIGHT="38" BORDER="0"
SRC="img457.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
{x^5}[n] = {1 \over 16} \cos (-3\omega n) + {4 \over 16} \c...
... \over 16} \cos (3 \omega n)
+ {1 \over 16} \cos (5 \omega n)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
and so on.
<A ID="eq-waveshaping"></A>The numerators of the fractions will be recognized as Pascal's triangle. The
<A ID="5747"></A>Central Limit Theorem
of probability implies that each <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img58.png"
ALT="$k$">th row can be
approximated by a Gaussian curve whose standard deviation (a measure of width)
is proportional to the square root of <IMG
WIDTH="12" HEIGHT="14" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img58.png"
ALT="$k$">.
<P>
The negative-frequency terms (which have been shown separately here for clarity)
are to be combined with the positive ones; the spectral envelope is folded
into itself in the same way as in the ring modulation example of
Figure <A HREF="node77.html#fig05.04">5.4</A>.
<P>
As long as the coefficients <IMG
WIDTH="19" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img458.png"
ALT="$f_k$"> are all positive numbers or zero, then so
are all the amplitudes of the sinusoids in the expansions above. In this
case all the phases stay coherent as <IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img4.png"
ALT="$a$"> varies and so we get a widening
of the spectrum (and possibly a drastically increasing amplitude) with
increasing values of <IMG
WIDTH="11" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0"
SRC="img4.png"
ALT="$a$">. On the other hand, if some of the <IMG
WIDTH="19" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img458.png"
ALT="$f_k$"> are
positive and others negative, the different expansions will interfere
destructively; this will give a more complicated-sounding spectral evolution.
<P>
Note also that the successive expansions all contain only even or only odd
partials. If the transfer function (in series form) happens to contain only
even powers:
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(x) = {f_0} + {f_2}{x^2} + {f_4}{x^4} + \cdots
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="204" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img459.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(x) = {f_0} + {f_2}{x^2} + {f_4}{x^4} + \cdots
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
then the result, having only even partials, will sound an octave higher than
the incoming sinusoid. If only odd powers show up in the expansion of <IMG
WIDTH="34" HEIGHT="32" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img460.png"
ALT="$f(x)$">,
then the output will contain only odd partials. Even if <IMG
WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img112.png"
ALT="$f$"> can't be expressed
exactly as a power series (for example, the clipping function of Figure
<A HREF="node77.html#fig05.03">5.3</A>), it is still true that if <IMG
WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img112.png"
ALT="$f$"> is an even function, i.e., if
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(-x) = f(x)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="93" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img461.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(-x) = f(x)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
you will get only even harmonics and if <IMG
WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="30" ALIGN="MIDDLE" BORDER="0"
SRC="img112.png"
ALT="$f$"> is an odd function,
<BR><P></P>
<DIV ALIGN="CENTER">
<!-- MATH
\begin{displaymath}
f(-x) = -f(x)
\end{displaymath}
-->
<IMG
WIDTH="106" HEIGHT="28" BORDER="0"
SRC="img462.png"
ALT="\begin{displaymath}
f(-x) = -f(x)
\end{displaymath}">
</DIV>
<BR CLEAR="ALL">
<P></P>
you will get odd harmonics.
<P>
Many mathematical tricks have been proposed to use waveshaping to generate
specified spectra. It turns out that you can generate pure sinusoids
at any harmonic of the fundamental by using a Chebychev polynomial as
a transfer function [<A
HREF="node202.html#r-lebrun79">Leb79</A>] [<A
HREF="node202.html#r-dodge85">DJ85</A>], and from there you can go on to build
any desired static spectrum (Example E05.chebychev.pd
demonstrates this.) Generating <I>families</I> of spectra by
waveshaping a sinusoid of variable amplitude turns out to be trickier,
although several interesting special cases have been found, some of which
are developed in detail in Chapter <A HREF="node89.html#chapter-paf">6</A>.
<P>
<HR>
<!--Navigation Panel-->
<A ID="tex2html1711"
HREF="node79.html">
<IMG WIDTH="37" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="next"
SRC="next.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1705"
HREF="node75.html">
<IMG WIDTH="26" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="up"
SRC="up.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1699"
HREF="node77.html">
<IMG WIDTH="63" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="previous"
SRC="prev.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1707"
HREF="node4.html">
<IMG WIDTH="65" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="contents"
SRC="contents.png"></A>
<A ID="tex2html1709"
HREF="node201.html">
<IMG WIDTH="43" HEIGHT="24" ALIGN="BOTTOM" BORDER="0" ALT="index"
SRC="index.png"></A>
<BR>
<B> Next:</B> <A ID="tex2html1712"
HREF="node79.html">Frequency and phase modulation</A>
<B> Up:</B> <A ID="tex2html1706"
HREF="node75.html">Modulation</A>
<B> Previous:</B> <A ID="tex2html1700"
HREF="node77.html">Multiplying audio signals</A>
&nbsp; <B> <A ID="tex2html1708"
HREF="node4.html">Contents</A></B>
&nbsp; <B> <A ID="tex2html1710"
HREF="node201.html">Index</A></B>
<!--End of Navigation Panel-->
<ADDRESS>
Miller Puckette
2006-12-30
</ADDRESS>
</BODY>
</HTML>